A. Cameron Ward Barristers and Solicitors » Opinion
A. Cameron Ward
Vancouver BC
Latest Action Post

Ward elected as bencher

November 28, 2013 in Opinion

Cameron Ward has recently been elected as a bencher of the Law Society of British Columbia, representing the County of Vancouver.

“I am honoured to have been given the opportunity to serve on our governing body”, said Mr. Ward.  “Any lawyer who has issues of concern regarding the governance of our profession can contact me any time.  I welcome new ideas and look forward to bringing a fresh perspective to the benchers’ table.”

Mr. Ward has been elected for a two year term commencing January 1, 2014.

posted by

The coroner’s inquest into the death of Greg Matters will resume in Prince George on January 27, 2014.

posted by


A coroner’s inquest into the death of Greg Matters begins Monday, October 7, 2013 in Prince George, BC.  Matters, a 40 year old Canadian Forces veteran suffering from PTSD after his return from Bosnia, was fatally shot on September 10, 2012 at his rural Prince George home by a heavily armed member of the RCMP’s Emergency Response Team.  According to police, Matters had disobeyed commands to drop a small hatchet just before he was shot.


posted by

At yesterday’s sparsely attended (224 of the province’s estimated 12,000 lawyers were present) Annual General Meeting of the Law Society of British Columbia, an amended version of our member’s resolution calling for complete disclosure of bencher expenses was defeated by a vote of 77-97.

As others have pointed out, a number of current and former benchers voted against the resolution.  A report of the AGM can be found here.

posted by

As a guest on the Bill Good show this morning, I opined that our system of civil justice is broken.

I believe that access to the system is becoming restricted to wealthy institutions who have the resources to treat civil litigation as a game to be won at all costs.  The average person cannot afford to be on the playing field with such cynical opponents.  As a result only those individuals with significant wealth or with a case that may be worth a lawyer’s involvement on a contingency fee basis can entertain seeking “justice” from the courts.

How did it come to this?

Measures designed to enhance access to justice and streamline processes have had the opposite effect.  Changes to the Rules of Court, as Chris Harvey, Q.C. has alluded to in the editorial posted below, have required more legal resources to be consumed on every case.  A simple Chambers application, for example, once could be brought on two days’ notice with minimal paperwork.  Now, it takes a couple of weeks to get an audience with a judge after preparing, exchanging and filing binders of material.  Judicial case management, while having some positive aspects, means that litigants are expected to attend pretrial hearings much more frequently.

All this comes at a cost.

This cost is going to discourage people from hiring lawyers and force them to either abandon meritorious claims or attempt to represent themselves before the courts.  From a societal point of view, this cannot be desirable.  We (lawyers, judges and the public) have to stop paying lip service to systemic reform and take a good hard look at the civil justice system from the perspective of the average person.  A justice system that is the preserve of only the very wealthy is really no system at all.

posted by

web design by rob c - Log in